Compliance & Sanctions Screening Compared
Running KYC checks across multiple watchlists manually? Compare 4 screening actors that automate OFAC, sanctions, PEP, and criminal background checks.
| Actor | Price | Success Rate | Users (30d) | Runs (30d) | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OFAC Sanctions List Search | $0.04/result-returned | 53.6% | 2 | 168 |
|
| Global Sanctions & Watchlist Search | $0.003/entity-fetched | 100.0% | 2 | 32 |
|
| Interpol Red Notice & Wanted Persons Search | $0.04/result-returned | 66.7% | 2 | 63 |
|
| AML Entity Screening | $0.30/analysis-run | 0.0% | 1 | 7 |
|
Feature comparison
| Feature | OFAC Sanctions List Search | Global Sanctions & Watchlist Search | Interpol Red Notice & Wanted Persons Search | AML Entity Screening |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OFAC/SDN screening | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Global sanctions lists | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| PEP screening | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Criminal background | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Fuzzy name matching | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Batch entity checks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Combined risk scoring | — | — | — | ✓ |
Which one should you use?
US Treasury SDN list screening. Best for US-focused compliance and OFAC checks.
Global sanctions and PEP databases. Best for international AML/KYC screening across 40+ lists.
Interpol wanted persons search. Best for criminal background and fugitive checks.
Combined AML screening pipeline. Best for comprehensive entity screening across multiple watchlists.